Students run mining firms competing for the same buyers, choosing how much to produce each round while price falls under the weight of everyone's combined output — the classic tension at the heart of oligopoly pricing.
Enter the simulation →A handful of firms sell into the same market. Each one decides how much to produce without knowing what the others will choose — and the market price responds to everyone's combined decision at once. Students don't just learn that competition erodes margins; they watch it happen to their own numbers, round after round, and have to decide how to respond.
The simulation supports several configurations of the same underlying tension, without switching tools:
Each team runs a lithium mine, selling directly to EV battery manufacturers who set the demand side of the market. Every round, teams decide how many tons to mine; price falls as total supply across all mines rises — mirroring the real oversupply cycles that have hit the actual lithium market in recent years.
Teams see their own results build up round by round: tons mined, price received, profit, and running totals — with a live leaderboard once results are revealed.
Every simulation follows the same shape — what changes is the strategic decision at its core and the industry context around it.
Before class, the teacher sets the conditions: how many markets, firms per market, and the specific market conditions — e.g., demand, cost, entry, exit, investment/acquisition opportunities, etc — so the same core idea can be taught several different ways.
Students join their respective teams and make real decisions, round after round, watching prices and payoffs move in response to everyone's choices — including their own.
Every round is logged automatically, and the full results can be downloaded by teacher and students alike. With real numbers on the table instead of a hypothetical, the class can dig into the strategic logic behind what happened — discussed in more depth, and grasped more readily, because everyone has already felt the pros and cons of their own choices firsthand.